guide
Regaining lost weight, and why it is not a failure of will
Regain is the rule, not the exception, and it has documented physiological causes. Knowing them does not make it inevitable, but it completely changes what you decide to do about it.
Regain is the rule
Long follow-ups all look alike: most people who lose weight put a large share of it back on in the following years, and some put it all back. That finding is often presented as a sentence. It is better read differently: if the same thing happens to almost everyone, the explanation cannot be individual. A cause that reaches the majority is not a character flaw. It is not a hopeless result either. The same follow-ups show that a share of people do maintain a lasting loss, often more modest than what they first aimed for, but quite real. Five to ten per cent kept for years beats twenty per cent lost then regained.
The hunger hormones stay altered
After weight loss, several signals shift level at once. Those telling the brain that stores are full go down, the one that triggers appetite before meals goes up. You might expect those settings to return within weeks. A widely cited study measured something else: a year after the loss, the signals were still tilted toward hunger. The body does not defend the weight you want, it defends the one it knew. This does not mean regain is written. It means maintaining takes an effort that does not fade on its own with time, while everyone expects the opposite. Many people let go because they thought it would have become easy by then.
What the speed of the loss changes
The idea that losing slowly protects against regain is widespread, and the trials comparing the two speeds do not really confirm it: at one year, the results converge. What truly separates them is what happens afterwards. A loss achieved through a diet you cannot hold necessarily ends, and the end of the diet is the beginning of the regain. A loss achieved through changes you can keep knows no such break. So the right question is not how fast, but with what. If the method disappears the day the target weight is reached, the regain is already scheduled, whatever the speed was.
What sets apart those who maintain
People who keep their loss for years have little in common, but that little turns up everywhere. They keep measuring something, weight or waist, at regular intervals, long after reaching their goal. They eat with a stable structure rather than at the mercy of the day. They move a lot in ordinary life, not only at the gym. And they get back on track quickly after a slip instead of waiting for Monday, or September. None of those points is spectacular. That is exactly what makes them sustainable over years, where an intense method does not last a quarter.
What to take away
The hunger that returns after a loss is physiological and it lasts. Expecting maintenance to become easy is the costliest mistake, because it makes people relax at exactly the wrong moment. The speed of the loss matters less than whether the method survives the goal. And a more modest loss, kept for years, beats a spectacular one that comes back. This page is educational. Weight that changes sharply for no reason, in either direction, is a conversation for a doctor.
Continue reading on the Sehtin journal
guide
The weight loss plateau, and what actually causes it
Two explanations circulate: a collapsing metabolism, and a lack of willpower. Both are wrong. What the measurements show is less dramatic and far more useful.
guide
Lowering HbA1c Through Diet: What Actually Matters
Three months later, the number has barely moved. Here is what actually changes it, and why it takes time.
guide
Khabith: What the Word Means, and What It Sets Aside
You meet the word on every page about this way of eating, and almost nowhere is it defined. It has one meaning, and it is narrower than people assume.
This article relays the public teachings of Dr. Diaa Al-Awadi for educational and informative purposes. It is not medical advice. Consult your physician before any dietary change. Legal notice.